From Imagined Communities to Cultures of Collectivization

Collective Concepts between Praxeology and Theories on Schemata and Frames

Authors

  • Jan-Christoph Marschelke Uni Regensburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22029/oc.2025.1493

Keywords:

practice theory, schema theory, imagined community, culture, collectivity

Abstract

This _Essay contributes to the issue of On Culture by asking how concepts like frame or schema could be used to analyze collectivity. It takes on a praxeological perspective which does not presuppose collectivities as given entities but as something that emerges from what we do: doing group, family, gender, nation. Part of these practices is an implicit and incorporated understanding or knowledge (i.e., culture) what it is that we are doing, how to collectivize and what for. These collectivization cultures—a conceptual extension of Benedict Anderson’s imagined communities—can be analyzed as consisting of frames or schemata. The _Essay draws on cognitive theories to distinguish collectivization scripts (e.g., frames of assembling, having dinner together) and collectivization themes (e.g., stereotypes, models of families, enterprises, nations). These again are interrelated, as are practices and practitioners, who carry collectivization experiences from one practice to another and frame nations as extended families or work teams as friendship circles.

Author Biography

  • Jan-Christoph Marschelke, Uni Regensburg

    Jan-Christoph Marschelke is post-doc researcher at and manager of the Institute for the Study of Culture and Collectivites at the University of Regensburg. His research is centered around praxeological approaches to collectivity, and he teaches introductory courses on theories of groups, organizations, social movements, crowds, and nationalism within the newly created B.A. minor Collectivity Studies at the University of Regensburg.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

Issue

Section

_Essays