Between Poetry and Natural Science: The Representation of Organic Nature around 1800
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22029/ko.2012.740Abstract
Michael Bies' study investigates the interconnectedness of 'vivacious representation' as an aesthetic and poetological ideal on the one hand and the corresponding goal of analysing 'living nature' in the evolving natural sciences in the late 18th and early 19th century on the other. Through detailed readings of Kant’s critical writings, Goethe's essays on the study of nature, and Alexander von Humboldt's scientific publications, Bies is able to show how the relationship of the two ideals is acknowledged as a theoretical dilemma in Kant, and how representations of nature such as Goethe's and Humboldt's are aimed at their mediation and reconciliation in both theory and representational practice, while their eventual disjunction in later 19th century scientific discourse is already foreshadowed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles (not book covers) in KULT_online from issue 50 on are published under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. All published articles may be reused under the conditions of the license, particularly for commercial purposes and through editing the article (Human-Readable Summary). All authors (have) permitted the publication under the above mentioned license. There is no copyright transfer towards KULT_online. For all book covers specific rights might be reserved, please contact the respective publisher for any lawful reuse. All contributions published in issue 1-49 of KULT_online are free available online and protected by the German Copyright Law.
