Describing the "Scientifically Incomprehensible": Monstrosities and Normalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22029/ko.2011.640Abstract
In the 19th century the so-called freaks were displayed in public while science constructed its own monstrosities. Both discourses are intimately connected with each other, but are often separated when studied by scholars. Birgit Stammberger succeeds in discussing both discourses together in her cultural philosophical study, which reveals the entanglements between science and popular culture. Based on Michel Foucault’s understanding of discourses, Stammberger analyses academic texts that continuously define and create monstrosities, pathologies, and consequently shape an understanding of normality. The body, as Stammberger shows using the case study of the female sex, is not without a history. Instead, it always serves to define normality and thus reveals society’s attitudes towards race and gender.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles (not book covers) in KULT_online from issue 50 on are published under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. All published articles may be reused under the conditions of the license, particularly for commercial purposes and through editing the article (Human-Readable Summary). All authors (have) permitted the publication under the above mentioned license. There is no copyright transfer towards KULT_online. For all book covers specific rights might be reserved, please contact the respective publisher for any lawful reuse. All contributions published in issue 1-49 of KULT_online are free available online and protected by the German Copyright Law.
