Going Rogue with Baudrillard: A Radical Re-Assessment of War Literature

  • Florian Andrei Vlad

Abstract

Konstanze Kutzbach’s OurSelves at War takes up the task of formulating a post-critical theoretical framework for analysing the borderline negotiations of identity, and the gendered body in particular, in Anglophone war literature from 1898 to the end of the 20th century. Treating war as a “volatile and productive metaphorical site” (p. 3) rather than violent military confrontation in an empirical frame of reference, Kutzbach traces what she argues is a paradigm shift from a focus on representation in war literature, where war and the gendered body entail a more or less straightforward political and ideological metaphoricity (prior to the 1960s), to problematisations of “representability rather than representations of borderline experience of the subject imposed through war and death” (p. 151). Conversely, this paradigm shift overlaps with another one, from the juxtaposition of hero and enemy as subject and object/other, to an increased ambiguity between identity and alterity: “the development from literature whose protagonists tend to locate the perceived threat outside their own self to works which conceive of the source of this threat as originating in the self rather than an external force” (p. 7).

Published
2010-10-31
How to Cite
Vlad, Florian Andrei. 2010. “Going Rogue With Baudrillard: A Radical Re-Assessment of War Literature”. KULT_online, no. 25 (October). https://doi.org/10.22029/ko.2010.570.
Section
KULT_reviews